in the strategic aspect, such integration

[rifat28dddd]

In my opinion, will be very useful, and is a natural continuation of the already close cooperation with Russia. It would be foolish to discard the fact that throughout all the years of independence we have been actively working with Russia, which is one of the main partners of Kazakhstan, not only in trade, but also in many other areas. Russia is much closer to Kazakhstan than, for example, another strong player in the region - China. And it is quite natural that the idea of ​​such a union arose with Russia, and not with China.

In macroeconomic terms, the CU also has more advantages taiwan cell phone number list than disadvantages, since we have a more simplified option for transit and sale of our main goods (oil, raw materials, grain, etc.) to the main consumers (EU, Russia).

After the transition period, when the rules for doing business in the new conditions are formalized, the investment attractiveness of creating new joint ventures will increase significantly. Kazakhstan is more attractive in terms of creating and doing business, so it should be expected that our country will be more attractive to foreign investors. A clear example is the recent visit to Kazakhstan and the agreements reached with representatives from Vietnam.

But there are also problems and disadvantages of integration. They should not be forgotten, they need to be recognized, they need to be worked on. Many negative aspects related to the activities of the CU arise due to the breakdown of old working mechanisms and the incompleteness, and often the absence of new mechanisms. Such problems are inherent in any transition period. In my opinion, such a period can last another 3-5 years before a relatively workable set of documents, principles and standards is created that allows for the effective solution of the tasks set before the union.