I have shared two approaches above. The first approach is “what results can be produced in the short term”. This is the general principle I follow when dealing with different projects and tasks. I first give myself a short period of time to produce some core results, test what risks and problems there are, and solve the problems early. This is the most effective way to meet the deadline as scheduled.
The second approach: "Three Deadlines" is belgium mobile database an extended version of the first approach. Especially when others directly give me a deadline, I need to know how to set several stages of verification lines for myself and realize when to start changing my approach. I even know how to set the most immediate sprint results line, so that I can better predict future risks at this moment and start changing my approach now.
There is a common principle behind these practices, which is to set good deadlines. This comes from "decomposing projects and tasks." Breaking down projects into several stages of results and tasks into specific next steps can help us better set multi-level deadlines and know how to adjust and change them.
I have shared a very complete project decomposition process in this article, and this is most closely related to time management. Without decomposition, there is no real time management: " A template for breaking down the thinking flowchart for the next action, so you can also focus on the reference steps instead of busying yourself ."
How to use an offensive calendar
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 9:43 am