Recommended GPUs for AMD FSR
As with previous iterations, both technologies upscale at a lower internal resolution, delivering a smoother experience without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. Additionally, both DLSS 3.5 and AMD FSR 3 include frame generation technologies that can further improve frame rates in demanding games. These features are generally recommended for newer GPUs: AMD suggests using the FSR 3 frame generation feature if you have at least a Radeon RX 5000 series or higher, while NVIDIA says you’ll need a GeForce RTX 20-series card or newer to take full advantage of DLSS frame generation.
So, while DLSS remains exclusive to NVIDIA, AMD FSR can be used on AMD, NVIDIA, and Intel graphics cards. However, for optimal performance, doesn’t it make sense to stick to each manufacturer’s afghanistan telegram data recommended solution? Do you like DLSS on NVIDIA GPUs and FSR on AMD GPUs? This question has been bugging me, so I decided to test it out by comparing a couple of games on a GeForce RTX 4060 with DLSS 3.5 and a Radeon RX 7600 with FSR 3. But before I show you what I found, I also wanted to give my opinion on the differences in visual quality between NVIDIA’s DLSS 3.5 and AMD’s FSR 3.
DLSS 3.5 vs FSR 3: Which One Looks Better?
Both of these upscaling technologies can do wonders when it comes to increasing frame rates, and if you haven’t seen them in action yet, read the benchmark section of this article to see what I mean. There’s more to the story than raw performance, though. Image quality matters too: how sharp everything looks, how well textures are applied and how well they look in motion, and last but not least, how lighting effects like reflections or shadows are rendered.