Lawyers in general also need this new perspective.

[mahbubamim077]

Above all, it is necessary to consider the context, pay attention to the future and do the math. Lots of math. In the interior of Minas Gerais, the main asset of a family was a large, empty industrial property. They thought about setting up a holding company , but given the context, it wouldn't be worth it; the idea was to rent it out.

It would be simpler and cheaper to maintain a condominium between the individuals, especially in view of the succession. In order to add legal value to the multilateral relationship, it was agreed to draw up a document regulating the relationship between the condominium owners; a convention, even though it was not a building condominium, even though bulk sms usa there would be no private areas, just common property. This convention (which could be called a contract, a pact, a regulation, whatever) would govern the relationship between the condominium owners and, mainly, would regulate ideal conditions for a good use of the property, dealing with issues such as rental allocation, distribution of amounts earned from rent, formation of a reserve fund for possible renovations, etc.

However, fate had a twist: a company appeared interested in using the property to form a shopping center in partnership, with an attached parking lot that would charge a fee, among other elements. Considering the new context and after doing the math, it was concluded that the best option would be to form a holding company. Do you see? There is no unequivocal formula for all cases, not even for a single case: it is a construction that is made based on the strategic use of legal technology.

New legal stance
Hence, we affirm that a new legal stance is necessary. A stance that, by the way, is already common among corporate lawyers who, even due to their clientele, are constantly challenged to deal with the new.