He had no idea how to lead or manage a discussion. I felt sorry for the embarrassed moderator, who basically only tried to act as a decoration between the discussants, occasionally saying or asking something incomprehensible. Again and again he looked helplessly at his microphone, as if he expected help from that side.
No trace of concept, of active listening, of EXPRESSION. I find it inconceivable how a good print journalist thinks he can just moderate like that. Moderation has to be learned. It seemed taiwan rcs data that the print journalist was not even aware that the audience was no longer taking him seriously. A prominent participant asked me after the event: "You analyze media appearances? Did the moderator do anything right?"
This question speaks for itself.
The audience rescued the helpless moderator from his embarrassing situation after the organizer stood up and clearly signaled that the time had long since passed. end the discussion with an incomprehensible final thought, the audience stopped participating and spontaneously covered up the stammering with loud clapping, rescuing the poor guy from his predicament stick to your last.
The embarrassing appearance of a probably good print journalist makes us realize: Moderation is not something you can just do! Moderation is a demanding job. Moderation and writing are two different things.