What could a neutral fact check on this statement have looked like? A suggestion: " pay TV and the license fee-financed SRG flat rate are not comparable. Whether a program à la carte would be more expensive or cheaper depends on the content actually consumed and its prices. For the individual, à la carte can be much cheaper australia rcs data than the existing flat rate. There is a considerable probability of this, especially among young customer groups. The truth content of Edith Graf-Litscher's statement: 30 percent."
Now Swissinfo has actually already shown what it wanted to show: the supporters of the "No-Billag" initiative are lying and the opponents have the monopoly on the truth. But a "fact check" with just three statements would be a bit thin. So it's Lukas Reimann's (SVP) turn again: "The SRG is completely dependent on the state. The Federal Council elects several administrative boards and exerts influence."
Now it becomes formal legal: The six authors point out that Article 93 of the Federal Constitution states that "the independence of radio and television as well as the autonomy of programming are guaranteed." The Radio and Television Act also clearly states: "Radio and television are independent of the state."