In my opinion, the new quality and the uniqueness of Clubhouse so far actually lies in its ad hoc nature and its orality, and thus also in the suggested non-binding nature of this new platform.
There are hardly any hurdles to entering into a live public conversation on an equal footing with people who you can otherwise only listen to on podiums. Just a mouse click away is the opportunity to be there subliminally and yet spontaneously have your say on stage. In addition, nothing can officially be recorded.
In my view, Clubhouse also serves a new australia rcs data desire for chattiness. In the internet, institutional hierarchies of knowledge producers and interpretive authority are becoming confused, which can also lead to uncertainty about the validity of norms and values. In addition, in my opinion, communications departments of organizations have a very strong control over the effect of individual statements on the public.
Clubhouse hits a nerve of the times with the opportunity for non-binding chatter with the aim of reaching agreement on what is valid. For media companies, this offers an unprecedented opportunity for meta-communication with the audience; in other words, to be able to explain how journalists work, which rules are observed, or how decisions are justified.