High-level communication
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2025 4:22 am
Unusually harsh words are being heard in Bern at the moment. There is talk of "betrayal", "impudence" and "innuendo that I do not accept". The Trade Union Federation (SGB) and Federal Councillor Johann Schneider-Ammann are at loggerheads. The dispute is escalating. The framework agreement with the EU is in danger because the SVP, SGB, SP and perhaps also the CVP are working together. "Blick" is now accusing these actors of being stubborn.
The Trade Union Confederation and the SVP have red taiwan rcs data lines in their dealings with the EU that must not be crossed. On the other hand, supporters of the framework agreement and the free movement of people believe that red lines should be avoided in negotiations with the EU and that flexibility is required.
Can we now accuse the SGB, the SP and the CVP of being stubborn? Is it not legal to specify exactly which line must not be crossed under any circumstances during negotiations? The EU also has red lines, as we know.
The Trade Union Confederation and the SVP have red taiwan rcs data lines in their dealings with the EU that must not be crossed. On the other hand, supporters of the framework agreement and the free movement of people believe that red lines should be avoided in negotiations with the EU and that flexibility is required.
Can we now accuse the SGB, the SP and the CVP of being stubborn? Is it not legal to specify exactly which line must not be crossed under any circumstances during negotiations? The EU also has red lines, as we know.