From YouTube to Text and Back Again, How Google Rates You

[shaownhasane]

Writing and publishing new content is one of the tasks afghanistan phone data of those who decide to have their own online presence.

Unfortunately, social media have taught us to wait with less and less patience for updates and at the same time they reward with positions and visibility the very producers of content that seem to be inexhaustible sources of news .

As humans, sometimes we don't have the right inspiration. In addition to trying to make writing new content a routine, it's a good idea to diversify by producing YouTube videos, for example, to give your neurons something else to focus on.

But, and this is the question that someone sent to Google experts, if for any reason the content that is in the form of a YouTube video is then re-proposed as text, do the famous penalties for duplicate content come into play ? Is there therefore a risk of cannibalization?

Let's see what Martin Splitt, who participated in the August episode of Google SEO Office Hours with John Mueller, had to say.

Returning to the hypothetical situation from our introduction, if you build a video for YouTube it is clear that you invest time and energy in building something that works and that reaches its audience and your goal.

The same thing happens if you are building text content for your site. This means that you need to calculate time for both managing the production of text content and the production of video content.

google responds on duplicate content
The question posed to Google experts (photo YT Google Search Central) -. sos-wp.it
Sometimes, for this very reason, you might be tempted to make the same content work on multiple platforms and in different ways. But when you decide to implement this form of creative recycling, does Google penalize you or not?

Does the search engine perceive as duplicate content what is on the video published on YouTube and what you could have transformed into a post on your blog? The answer comes directly from Splitt who clarifies in a few words that there is no form of cannibalization because one content is a video and the other content is a post on your blog, therefore it is a text.