This difference in tokenization, how the characters are broken down into bytes and converted to k, highlights the important difference between writing efficiency and hinting efficiency in Chinese. When faced with a k-word limit, such as an upper limit of k, English becomes a more efficient hinting language than Chinese or Korean. Comparison of k-word efficiency of "猫" in various languagesEnglish 猫 k Chinese 猫 k Korean 고양이猫 k In the narrow example of expressing "猫", English is times more efficient than Chinese and times more efficient than Korean. In the encoding of , characters are usually 1 to 10 bytes, while most languages in the world take 10 to 10 bytes.
Therefore, the token length of non-English languages indonesia whatsapp phone number tends to be 10 to 100 words on average, which is less efficient than English. Considering the extended context length of , the difference in efficiency of languages becomes more obvious. 10 is about how many words. Here is an average. English is about 10 words, Simplified Chinese is about 10 characters, Korean is about 10 characters. English is about 10 times more efficient than Chinese in terms of word efficiency, and Korean is about 10 times more efficient. In summary, English is the most efficient language with a prompt efficiency of about 10 times that of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean.
Two other examples of languages are Klingon (K) and Javanese (Javanese). The support of the large language model for a language depends on whether the language is included in the standard character encoding system. If a language is missing, the large language model will not support it. The following are examples of unsupported languages. Tangsa - the language of the Tangsa people in India and Myanmar. Toto - the language of the Toto tribe in West Bengal, India. Ainu - the language of the Ainu people in Japan. Limited support for some characters in the Katakana area. - A script used to write the Miao language, created in the middle of the century.