Alexander Bondarenko sees a potential

[rakhirhif8963]

Problem with the law in the fact that its implementation in real life will take several years, since critical objects, due to their characteristics, will require serious adaptation of existing protection mechanisms.

It is good that the state has so clearly shown concern about the security of critical information infrastructure. But Vasily Stepanenko sees the problem with Federal Law 187 in the fact that, in his opinion, it is poorly coordinated with other laws that have long been in force in a number of industries designated as potential critical information infrastructure entities. It is also unclear with the responsibility for fulfilling the requirements of the law, for example, where the area of ​​responsibility of the head of the entity lies, and where it is that of other officials. Not everything is clear with financing either. "It is possible to oblige everyone to allocate budgets and be afraid of inspections, but without proper financing, including from the state, it is difficult to achieve real results," the expert believes.

As for the prospects of the law, Anton Taran lithuania mobile database that it is difficult to talk about it yet. On the one hand, purely theoretically, systematization, coordination and standardization have never harmed anyone, and if the future system really works, and the costs for the economy of the subjects of the critical information infrastructure do not exceed the potential risks, then we can expect an increase in the level of security. On the other hand, it will be very difficult to talk about assessing the effectiveness of the law until quantitative indicators of security are determined.