If done right, this setup can be great, as it provides the usability benefits of client-side rendering, the SEO benefits of server-side rendering, and a fast first paint even if Time to Interactive is often negatively impacted by rehydration as JS kicks in. I won’t go into too much detail here for fear of oversimplifying the task, but the point is that while isomorphic JavaScripttrue server-side rendering can be a powerful solution, it’s often very complex to set up .
So, what are the other options? If you can't justify the time or expense of a fully isomorphic setup, or it's just overkill for what you're trying to achieve, are there other ways you can reap the benefits of a single-page application model and a hybrid rendering setup without ruining your SEO ?
Rendering usable content on the server side doesn't armenia mobile database necessarily mean that the rendering process itself needs to happen on the server. All we need is that the rendered HTML is there, ready to be served to the client; the rendering process itself can happen anywhere you like. With the JAMstack approach , rendering content to HTML is part of the build process.
As a quick primer, the term stands for JavaScript, API , and Markup , and it describes a way to build complex websites without server-side software. The process of assembling a site from its front-end component parts—a task that a traditional site might accomplish using WordPress and PHP—is performed as part of the build process, while interactivity is handled on the client side using JavaScript and APIs.