The Trump phenomenon and the role of the media were commented on in many media outlets after the presidential election in the USA. However, some authors wrote their view of things from the perspective of their own subjective opinion filter bubble. case with the most recent media-critical media club.
A common thread
Fischlin used a few specific questions as india rcs data a guiding thread. He was primarily concerned with trust in the established media. Today, it can be said that more and more people are getting their information exclusively via social media, via Twitter, Facebook, etc. Fake news receives more attention than fact-based news. Therefore, we must ask ourselves: What does this media development mean for opinion formation? What lessons can the media learn from Trump's election?
Matthias Ackeret, who went to the United States to personally assess the mood, pointed out that we cannot always rely on published opinion. The situation on the ground is often not as journalists portray it. From his optimistic point of view, the traditional media have a great chance today if they help the public to classify the flood of information. Media scientist Zehnder described how the media can fall into the attention trap. The media want to cover every scandal, which inevitably means that the provocateur becomes the topic of conversation. Trump knew how to generate the necessary attention and thus received much more airtime.